Sunday, September 28, 2014

Halloween

What do we really know about Halloween? Is it just a fun day of the year that we can get all dressed up like monsters and have a little bit of fun? Should we allow our children to participate in this event by dressing them up and chauffeuring them door to door for candy and other treats? Is there a deeper meaning to what most of us celebrate each year on October 31? How did Halloween begin anyway?
Halloween was originally known as all hallows eve. It was started around the year 200 bc and continued until roughly 200 ad. This was a Celtic practice from the British Isle in France. This group of people practiced a religion known as Druidism. These Druids included the Celtic priests and shamans. They would study and practice witchcraft, magic, and necromancy. Necromancy is the practice of communicating with the dead, with purposes of predicting the future. Samhain was known as “the feast of the dead” and it was practiced on October 31. This date is also known as all hallows eve, it was the day before their new year.
On this day, the town’s people believed that they must appease the evil spirits by giving them offerings. They believed that on this day the veil between the living and the dead were dropped, allowing spirits to walk the earth. Giant bonfires were lit to help guide these spirits to the world of the living. Animals, crops, and humans were thrown into the fire as sacrifices to these spirits. The townspeople would leave out their offerings of food so that the evil spirits would not play tricks on them, or harm them in any way. They would also wear disguises in order to fool the spirits into thinking they too were evil spirits so they might not harm them.
The druids also required human sacrifices for these spirits. They would go door to door asking for virgins, also known as innocent blood. If the home owners refused to give up their child, the druids would paint a hexagram on the door. This hexagram was used as a sign for the evil spirits. All homes with this sign would be attacked by the evil spirits. They would terrorize all living in the home and this sometimes resulted in death.

Bobbing for apples?
The Romans held a festival called Feralia during the end of October. This festival was in honor of their goddess Pomona, known as the apple queen. The people would throw apples over their shoulders to help decide marital partners.  Roman Catholics took control of the Celtics and changed the name of this three day festival to Halloween or all hallows eve, or all saints day. When the Romans took control of the Celts, they combine both festivals. Bobbing for apples was a result of this combined festival. Unfortunately, as with many other pagan traditions such as Christmas and Easter, the Romans kept this tradition, but simply changed several of the names in order to call it good.
Halloween is full of pagan practices. There really isn’t anything that should be considered innocent fun when dealing with this celebration. Allister Crowley, an English occultist known for developing what Christians would call satanic worship, said that he loved, “that Christians allow their children to worship satan one night every year.” Anton Levey, a follower of Crowley, wrote in his book, “The Satanic Bible,” “After one’s own birthday, the two major satanic holidays are walpurgisnacht night and Halloween.”  Walpurgis Night is the English translation of Walpurgisnacht, the German name for the night of 30 April, so called because it is the eve of the feast day of Saint Walpurga, an 8th-century abbess in Germany. As we can see, Satanists believe Halloween is one of the biggest holidays of the year.
3 John 1:11
Beloved, do not imitate what is evil, but what is good. He who does good is of God, but he who does evil has not seen God.
                Halloween is chalked full of evil. We see devils, witches, ghosts and death. Being associated with this satanic holiday seems to go directly against what God has told us to do.
2 Corinthians 6: 17
Therefore “Come out from among them and be separate, says the Lord. Do not touch what is unclean, And I will receive you.”
                We should not be Christianizing pagan holidays. We should be abstaining from them altogether. Pagan evil spirit worship is just that. What we are doing on Halloween is exactly the same as what the ancient pagans did; we just changed the name and called it good. Believing that we are not doing this same practice for the same purposes does not mean that we are not doing it. Practicing these pagan rituals under the assumption that they are now okay because it doesn’t mean the same thing is simply a lie we were led to believe from Satan. God does not want us doing this, for ANY reason.  He hates all things that deal with the worship of other gods.

So I ask you, is this really something you want to teach your children to participate in?

Thursday, July 3, 2014

Nephilim Giants

I want to talk a little bit about the nephilim giants. Opening the bible in Genesis we only get six chapters in before we stumble across this word. What does it mean? Who were they? Where did they come from? How did they return after the world-wide flood? I am going to attempt to answer these questions using the bible, Septuagint, extra biblical text, and ancient mythologies from around the world. I will also interject a bit of my own speculation from time to time based on some of my own views of how things potentially went down. Of course, I must state up front that I could be entirely wrong on all aspects of this writing, therefore don’t take my word for it but rather read what I have to say and then look into all these things for yourself. Personally, I got tired of reading so many different points of view on these topics so that is precisely what I have decided to do.

What does Nephilim mean?

The word nephilim is found in the bible three times in two verses, once in Genesis 6:4 and twice in Numbers 13:33. The Hebrew word is Nephiyl which is translated to either nephilim or giants. The Merriam Webster dictionary defines nephilim as a biblical race of giants or demigods. It seems pretty clear that the nephilim were a people group of giants. We will get into that a bit more later.

The word nephilim is not the only word in the bible that is translated as giants. Rapha is used 11 times in the bible and it too is translated at giants, or Rephaim. Rephaim is used in describing a group or race of giants; this is basically the same definition that the Merriam Webster dictionary has as well.

We can conclude that both the words nephilim and rephaim are describing some sort of race or group of giants that lived in the ancient world.

Who were these giants?

Genesis chapter 6 tells us that they originally came from the intermixing with fallen angels and humans. The giants AFTER the flood are a bit trickier to pin down. It is my opinion that these giants and other nephilim were the same characters as the demigods from ancient mythologies. These demigods include Hercules, Perseus, Thor, and Achilles. I also feel that the ancient gods of mythology were the fallen angels themselves based on the abilities that the gods had and how those supernatural attributes line up with the biblical account of what angels are able to do.

Genesis 6: 4

There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

This verse has been debated many times trying to figure out who the “sons of God” were. I have previously gone into detail on that topic so I will not do it here. What I would like to look at is the “the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown,” portion of the text.

            Merriam Webster defines renown as, “great fame and respect”. Not only were the ancient gods worshiped, but their demigod children were well respected and are still famous to this day. This would seem to indicate at least the possibility that some of the ancient legends and myths have some merit to them. I am sure that there have been embellishments over the centuries, but they could have some truth to them.

            Hercules was a man of great strength and wit. He was able to withstand the 12 labors that any one of these labors would have certainly killed a normal human. He was the son of Zeus, who in my opinion was possibly one of the original fallen angels, but could have been a third generation nephilim. I say that because Zeus did seem to possess some of the abilities that we see angels have in the bible. However, it is not unheard of that these abilities could have been possibly passed down, though a bit diluted in the children and grandchildren. If Josephus is correct, he says that the Greek Titans were the first generation nephilim. These were the ones before the flood, and according to Enoch, they were very, very large.

Josephus “Antiquities of the Jews 1.3.1

“For many angels of God accompanied with women, and begat sons that proved unjust, and despisers of all that was good, on account of the confidence they had in their own strength; for the tradition is, that these men did what resembled the acts of those whom the Grecians call titans.”

Enoch 7: 3

And the women became pregnant, and they bare large giants, whose height was three hundred cubits.

A cubit is commonly converted as 1.5 feet. That means this verse is saying that the original first generation nephilim were 450 feet tall. Thus, this would make sense taking into consideration the size of the Greek titans known in the mythology.

Jubilees also has something to say concerning the size of the offspring of the angel human hybrid nephilim.

Jubilees 5: 1

When the children of men began  to multiply on the face of the earth and daughters were born to them, and the angels of God saw them on a certain year of this jubilee, that they were beautiful, and they took themselves wives of all whom they chose, and they gave birth to their sons and they were giants.

            Isn’t it at least possible that the first generation nephilim could have been that Greek titans? Enoch says that this first generation killed each other off within 500 years, and the angels were bound in Tartarus for 70 generations.

Enoch 10: 9-12

To Gabriel said the Lord: ‘Proceed against the bastards and the reprobates, and against the children of fornication and destroy the children of fornication and the children of the Watchers. Cause them to go against one another that they may destroy each other in battle: shorten their days. No request that (the Watchers) their fathers make of you shall  be granted them on their behalf; for they hope to live an eternal life, and that each one of them will live five hundred years.’ And the Lord said to Michael: Go, bind Semjaza and his team who have associated with women and have defiled themselves in all their uncleanness.  When their sons have slain one another, and they have seen the destruction of their beloved ones, bind them fast for seventy generations under the hills of the earth, until the day of the consummation of their judgment and until the eternal judgment is accomplished.

            If Noah was 600 years old when he went into the Ark, and the watchers came down during the days of Jared, then these first generation nephilim would have been long gone and only their DNA would have been left inside their grandchildren. But I think there was more to it than just that. I also believe that when the book of Jasher tells us that man began to sin against the beasts, fish and birds, and then the bible tells us all flesh was corrupt; there was some kind of genetic manipulation going on. These fallen angels taught man many secrets of heaven. And not long after this we read that men began doing these things. Therefore, I can conclude that since the original “titans” were already destroyed, what was left was a mixture of some angel DNA with some humans, but also some animal human hybrid beings.

            We can see when the Watcher descended on Mt. Hermon from the book of Enoch. Considering the way the children were named it would make sense that they “fell” just before his birth. At least the first ten biblical names all have meanings based on what was going on. Jared means “shall come down”. I am taking this from Chuck Missler. He discovered a pretty amazing trend from the first ten patriarchs in the bible.

Adam – Man
Seth – Appointed
Enosh – Mortal
Kenan – Sorrow
Mahalalel – Blessed God
Jared – Shall come down
Enoch – Teaching
Methusealah – His death shall bring
Lamech – The despairing
Noah – Rest

Man (is) appointed mortal sorrow; (but) the Blessed God shall come down teaching (that) His death shall bring (the) despairing rest.

            Here is the link to Chuck Missler’s site: http://www.khouse.org/articles/1996/44/

            Jared was born in 3540 BC or 460 years after Adam, so the angels would have had to come just before that or they were possibly coming down as he was being born so they named him descended or shall come down. The Flood occurred during the year 2348 BC or 1656 years after Adam. Doing the math here we can see that if we go on the assumption that the angels came down ON the birthday of Jared, giving them 5 year to take wives and have a first nephilim child, the 500 year life-span of that first generation of nephilim only puts us at the year 965 after Adam. That leaves us with a gap of roughly 691 years before The Flood, and about 91 years before Noah is even born. This gap had to have been filled with the second and third generations of nephilim. This would also make sense taking into consideration the ancient gods of antiquity. These second and third generation gods would still have had very long lifespans, and they most likely possessed some of their angel father’s supernatural abilities.

            It seems pretty fair to say that all of the nephilim from before The Flood were descendants of the fallen angels and humans that took part in the unnatural interbreeding experiment. It also seems fair to say that the second, third and so on generations of nephilim, were both male and female, known as the ancient gods, and were able to corrupt all the worlds flesh during the years leading up to The Flood. How were they able to corrupt all flesh?

The corruption of all flesh

            The Bible tells us the YHWH had become repentant of His creation of mankind because they had gone about corrupting themselves along with all other flesh.

Genesis 6: 12

And God looked upon the earth, and, behold, it was corrupt; for all flesh had corrupted his way upon the earth.

            We know that this too included the animals of the world at that time as well based on another scripture found in the New Testament.

1 Corinthians 15: 39

All flesh is not the same flesh: but there is one kind of flesh of men, another flesh of beasts, another of fishes, and another of birds.

            Some of the other sources confirm this idea of all flesh being corrupted.

Jasher 4: 18

And their judges and rulers went to the daughters of men and took their wives by force from their husbands according to their choice, and the sons of men in those days took from the cattle of the earth, the beasts of the field and the fowls of the air, and taught the mixture of animals of one species with the other, in order therewith to provoke the Lord; and God saw the whole earth and it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted its ways on the earth all men and all animals.

Jubilees 5: 2-3

Because of them lawlessness increased on the earth and all flesh corrupted its way. Men and cattle and beasts and birds and everything that walked on the earth were all corrupted in their ways and their orders, and they began to devour each other. Lawlessness increased on the earth and the imagination and thoughts of all men were continually, totally evil. God looked on the earth, and saw it was corrupt, and all flesh had corrupted its orders, and all that were on the earth had committed all manner of evil before His eyes.

Jubilees 7: 24

After this they sinned against the beasts and birds, and all that moved and walked on the earth, and much blood was shed on the earth, and men continually desired only what was useless and evil.

All of these passages seem to indicate that men had learned forbidden knowledge from the fallen angels and used it to mix the DNA of animals with each other and with humans. This also plays into the ancient mythologies if you take into consideration the Centaur, Minotaur, and Satyr. I always wondered where Homer got the idea for these types of creatures; I just never thought it would have had any relation to the biblical stories.

            Now we can see that it was an indirect action of the fallen angels, but NOT the fallen angels themselves that caused YHWH to flood the entire world. It was an act of MERCY on His part to help protect His original creation of mankind. Without his flooding of the entire world, none of us would be here, at least not in the physical state we are now. Maybe we would all be some type of animal human hybrids. The sad thing about this idea is that we seem to be creating these very same creatures in labs all over the world today and have been for at least the past few years.

            So not only did we see that the corruption of all flesh began with the mixing of angels and humans, but it continued AFTER the angels were punished and the first generation nephilim killed each other off. The continuation was due to the mixing of species through genetic manipulation. YHWH does not seem to like this because it is I direct cause of lawlessness, also known as sin.

How did the nephilim return AFTER the world-wide Flood?

            There seems to be two main ideas as to how the nephilim giants returned after the flood. The first seems pretty obvious. There was another incursion where more angels came to earth and again had sex with human women and therefore created more giants. I see how this would make sense. I mean it seems like a no-brainer, right. Well my biggest problem with this idea is that there is absolutely no mention of this happening again anywhere. There is nothing even remotely stated like this in the Bible, Jubilees, Enoch, or Jasher. What the book of Enoch does mention concerning this idea is this.

Enoch 68: 2-5

And on that day Michael answered Raphael and said: ‘The power of the spirit grips me and makes me tremble because of the severity of the judgment of the secrets, and the judgment of the angels. Who can endure the severe judgment which has been executed, and before which they melt away?’ And Michael answered again, and said to Raphael: ‘Who would not have a softened heart concerning it, and whose mind would not be troubled by this judgment against them because of those who have led them out?’ And it came to pass when he stood before the Lord of spirits, Michael said thus to Raphael: ‘I will not defend them under the eye of the Lord; for the Lord of spirits has been angry with them because they act as if they were the Lord. Therefore, all that is hidden shall come on them for ever and ever; for no other angel or man shall have his portion in this judgment, but they alone have received their judgment for ever and ever.

            The statements that the Arch Angel Michael makes here definitely seem to indicate that no other angels would ever commit such an act against YHWH. Even he is troubled by the thought of the punishment passed down from God on this group of angels.

            Based on the fact that there are no other mentions of angels-human copulation, and the words spoken by the angels Michael, I cannot take this scenario as a plausible one.

            Before I go on to the second theory, and the one that I personally think makes the most sense, I would like to state that previously I had thought that maybe the book of Jubilees had a third possible way that the nephilim could have returned after the flood. It is a position held by Dr. Ken Johnson. He states it in his book Fallen Angels. He says that the book of Jubilees is describing Canaan (which is Kainam in Jubilees). Here is the verse.

Jubilees 8: 3-4 (Kainam)

He found writing which former generations had carved on a rock, and he read what was on it, and he transcribed it and sinned because of it, for it contained the teachings of the Watchers, which they had used to observe the omens of the sun and moon and stars in all the signs of heaven. He wrote it down and said nothing of it, for he was afraid to speak to Noah about it or he would be angry with him because of it.

            I assumed these writings could have contained a way to make yourself into a type of nephilim, which they very well could have been. But I thought that this character would have been Nimrod from Genesis 10: 8. Dr. Ken Johnson seems to think this was Canaan, but Rob Skiba pointed out to me that this could NOT have been the case because Cannan was born to Ham, and this child (Kainam) was born to Arpachshad who was the son of Shem. Kainam could have found these writings, hid them from Noah, and later give the information to Nimrod in order for him to become a “mighty man” (Gen. 10:8).

            The latter would also make sense with the third theory, which is nephilim DNA made its way onto the ark in the three wives of Noah’s sons. If these genes are dormant, then the theory with Nimrod would make sense if all his brothers were nephilim but his nephilim DNA was dormant. Obtaining the knowledge of the Watchers, and being able to make himself a nephilim through some kind of ritual with that knowledge could have possibly allowed him to become one of the strongest types of nephilim; allowing him to become king of the world Nimrod.

            I know there are a lot of people that will not like the idea of nephilim DNA making its way onto the ark, but this theory make the most sense in my opinion. I say this because we see a direct line of giants that go all the way back to the ark, the offspring of Ham in particular.

Genesis 10:6

And the sons of Ham; Cush, and Mizraim, and Phut, and Canaan.

Genesis 10: 15-19

Canaan was the father of Sidon his firstborn, and of the Hittites,  Jebusites, Amorites, Girgashites,  Hivites, Arkites, Sinites,  Arvadites, Zemarites and Hamathites. Later the Canaanite clans scattered  and the borders of Canaan reached from Sidon toward Gerar as far as Gaza, and then toward Sodom, Gomorrah, Admah and Zeboyim, as far as Lasha.

Deuteronomy 20:16-17

“But of the cities of these peoples which the Lord your God gives you as an inheritance, you shall let nothing that breathes remain alive, but you shall utterly destroy them: the Hittite and the Amorite and the Canaanite and the Perizzite and the Hivite and the Jebusite, just as the Lord your God has commanded you,

            It seems pretty clear that aside from King Nimrod, all the groups of nephilim came from Ham. Ham was the son of Noah and he was saved from The Flood on the ark. In my eyes this is a clear cut situation. The sons of Noah were pure through the lineage of Noah. Noah’s wife was pure because she was married to Noah and in marriage two become one. The only place the nephilim DNA could have come from would be through the three wives. This makes sense too because Ham is not infected but immediately after they step off the ark Noah curses Canaan.

Genesis 9: 24-25

And Noah awoke from his wine, and knew what his younger son had done unto him. And he said, Cursed be Canaan;

            We can see that Canaan was born either ON the ark or immediately after they got off the ark because he is mentioned in the same verse as the others getting off the ark.

Genesis 9: 18

And the sons of Noah, that went forth of the ark, were Shem, and Ham, and Japheth: and Ham is the father of Canaan.

            Notice that he is the only grandson of Noah mentioned. Also notice that YHWH specifically mentions Ham being the father of Canaan here and two more times BEFORE the rest of the lineages of any of Noah’s sons.

            Since I don’t see any mention of giants in the lineage of Shem, I am not sure what ever happened with Kainam. I do think that he shared those Watcher writings with Nimrod and they are what caused him to become a giant. The Septuagint states this pretty matter of fact.  

The giants after the flood seemed to have some deformities.

2 samuel 21: 20

And there was yet a battle in Gath, where was a man of great stature, that had on every hand six fingers, and on every foot six toes, four and twenty in number; and he also was born to the giant.

            Maybe this is something Noah noticed about Canaan once they got off the Ark and it is the reason he cursed him. We can also see that giants are born to other giants. This idea also supports the nephilim DNA being dormant in some but active in others.

Numbers 13:32

There we saw the giants (the descendants of Anak came from the giants); and we were like grasshoppers in our own sight, and so we were in their sight.”

            We can also see that the nephilim were giants after the flood as well.

Amos 2: 9

“Yet it was I who destroyed the Amorite before them, Whose height was like the height of the cedars,

            So the post flood nephilim had double rows of teeth, six fingers and toes, could get up to 36 feet tall (the height of the cedars in Lebanon), and they were very strong. We do see that they seem to get smaller the further away from the flood we get. That also plays into the idea of nephilim DNA on the ark. The more diluted it gets the weaker the genes are.

Deutonomy 3:11

For only Og king of Bashan remained of the remnant of giants; behold his bedstead was a bedstead of iron; is it not in Rabbath of the children of Ammon? nine cubits was the length thereof, and four cubits the breadth of it, after the cubit of a man.

            Taking into consideration the length of a cubit discussed earlier, a bed that is 9 cubits long is roughly 13-14 feet long. That would make this man about 12 to 13 feet tall. Considering his bed was made of iron, he was most likely very heavy as well. Later we read about Goliath and he is only 9-10 feet tall.

I simply do not see any biblical evidence for a second incursion with any new fallen angels. The best, most biblically supported theory for the post flood nephilim seems to come from the fact that they can be traced back to the Ark, and come from Ham’s lineage. I have heard others say that they have traced Gog and/or Magog back to Japeths line, but I have yet to look into that idea.

These are the nephilim giants the way I see them. I acknowledge that I could be wrong on some of these ideas, but I also want to state that it seems pretty clear what the Bible is trying to tell us about these beings. I hope you enjoyed this journey of discovering who the bible and extra biblical text say the nephilim really are.

If you enjoyed this blog, check out my book. I used much of this research in writing my book. 

http://www.amazon.com/Other-Gods-Exploring-Ancient-Humanity-ebook/dp/B010RLQDQQ/ref=sr_1_3?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1440026614&sr=1-3&keywords=steve+casteel


If you enjoy these blogs, join my google community here…


Also I would love to hear your opinions on things that I post on Facebook along with your original thoughts and questions. Like my page here

https://www.facebook.com/groups/473901429432572/



Thanks for taking the time to check out my blog!

Monday, June 9, 2014

Sons of God - Humans or Angels (Update 6-28)


            Who are the “Sons of God” that Genesis chapter six refers to? There are two main theories concerning this phrase. The first idea is that this chapter is talking about the good or Godly sons of Seth, the replacement child of Adam after the death of Able. The second idea is that this phrase is referring to fallen divine angelic beings that were originally supposed to watch over humans. According to the book of Enoch, this class of angels was known as the Watchers. I plan to give evidence that supports the second idea and casts doubt on the Sethite view. I will use biblical, extra biblical and outside sources to prove my point.

 Genesis 6: 1-2, 4

When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them, the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown.

            The Hebrew used for Sons of God is Ben-ha-e-lo-him. This phrase is used five times in the Old Testament. The first two occur in Genesis chapter six. The next three occur in the book of Job.

Job 1: 6

Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came among them.

Job 2:1

Again there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan came also among them to present himself before the Lord. 

Job 38: 4-7

“Where were you when I laid the foundations of the earth?
Tell Me, if you have understanding.
Who determined its measurements?
Surely you know!
Or who stretched the line upon it?
To what were its foundations fastened?
Or who laid its cornerstone,
When the morning stars sang together,
And all the sons of God shouted for joy?

Job 38 is clearly discussing the creation account when it then states that the “sons of God shouted for joy.” How could this be the sons of Seth, if humans had not even been created? Many Christians believe that this phrase is Job is describing angels, but the same phrase in Genesis is not. This represents inconsistent hermeneutics. Hermeneutics is the branch of knowledge that deals with interpretation, especially of the Bible or literary texts. Translating the same phrase as two different meanings is setting yourself up for a misunderstanding of the text.

One of the main reasons that the Sethite view is pushed is based on a verse from Genesis chapter 4.

Genesis 4: 26

And as for Seth, to him also a son was born; and he named him Enosh. Then men began to call on the name of the Lord.

            First I would like to point out that the word “men”, does not appear in the Hebrew text. The Hebrew for “Then men began to cal on the name of the LORD” is “Chalal qara shem YHWH”. Chalal: to pierce, defile, desecrated, this is Strong’s H2490. Qara: call, summon, proclaim (Strong’s H7121). Shem: name. YHWH: the Hebrew name for God. So this would be appropriately translated as “Then the name of God began to be desecrated or defiled.” This translation of this verse does not lend itself to the suggestion that the sons of Seth were holy by any means.

Leviticus 19: 12

And you shall not swear by My name falsely, nor shall you profane the name of your God: I am the Lord.

            The word profane is the same word Chalal used in Genesis 4: 26.

            The book of Jasher actually comes right out and says what I am claiming.

Jasher 2: 2

And Seth lived one hundred and five years, and he had a son; and Seth called the name of his son Enosh, saying, Because in that time the sons of men began to reproduce, and to afflict their souls and hearts by disobeying and rebelling against God.

            Dr. Chuck Missler has this to say about the meaning of the name Enosh.

“Seth's son was called Enosh, which means mortal, frail, or miserable. It is from the root anash, to be incurable, used of a wound, grief, woe, sickness, or wickedness. It was in the days of Enosh that men began to defile the name of the Living God.”

            According to the International Standard Bible Encyclopedia,” Some commentators hold that by “sons of God” is to be understood the pious race descended form Seth, and by “daughters of men” the daughters of worldly men. These commentators connect the passage with Genesis 4: 25 where the race of Seth is characterized as the worshippers of Yahweh and is designated as a whole seed.” However, if this was the case, why doesn’t the text just state that to be the case? It is my reasoning that leads me to believe that some of these men have mistranslated words and come to this false conclusion based on these erred translation. 

            Now I want to talk a little bit about the angels themselves. First of all, it is my belief that many of the ancient rulers. Kings, and judges, were in deed these “fallen” angels themselves. The biggest arguments that I have heard is that they do not have physical bodies, and therefore are unable to procreate. This is actually two arguments, the first being they have no physical bodies, and the second, if they do then they don’t have the proper equipment to procreate. Let’s take a look at what the bible says concerning angels and physical bodies first.

Psalms 78:25

Human beings ate the bread of angels; he sent them all the food they could eat.

If angels did not have physical bodies, why would they have physical food that even man can eat? Angels are both spiritual and physical. Angels have the ability to take on human form as we can see from this passage from Genesis.

Genesis 18: 1-8

 The Lord appeared again to Abraham near the oak grove belonging to Mamre. One day Abraham was sitting at the entrance to his tent during the hottest part of the day. 2 He looked up and noticed three men standing nearby. When he saw them, he ran to meet them and welcomed them, bowing low to the ground. 3 “My lord,” he said, “if it pleases you, stop here for a while. 4 Rest in the shade of this tree while water is brought to wash your feet. 5 And since you’ve honored your servant with this visit, let me prepare some food to refresh you before you continue on your journey.”

“All right,” they said. “Do as you have said.”

6 So Abraham ran back to the tent and said to Sarah, “Hurry! Get three large measures[a] of your best flour, knead it into dough, and bake some bread.” 7 Then Abraham ran out to the herd and chose a tender calf and gave it to his servant, who quickly prepared it. 8 When the food was ready, Abraham took some yogurt and milk and the roasted meat, and he served it to the men. As they ate, Abraham waited on them in the shade of the trees.

The three men mentioned here are YHWH, and the two angels that destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah. We can see several things from this. First, they take the form of humans, second we see them eating and third we can imply that they are also drinking.

Hebrews 13:2

Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares.

            This verse clearly is stating that angels have the ability to appear in the flesh, so much so that men cannot tell the difference between them and other humans. How else can you explain the idea of entertaining angels without being aware that they ARE angels? This just further shows one of two things. Either angels are created and naturally look similar to men, or they have the ability to change forms or “shape shift” if you will.

 Genesis 19: 1, 5
The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground.
They called to Lot, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them.”

            This verse seems to indicate that men and angels both had the proper parts and ability to physically see and copulate with each other.  All these verses put together should show that the angels do in fact have the ability to manifest into physical human-like bodies. As far as the angles not being able to procreate, I don’t see anything in the bible that specifically states that claim. However, I do see that the men in these two cities long for the chance to have sex with these angels. Whether they knew they were angels or not I cannot be sure.

Matthew 22: 30

For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God in heaven.

            This does not mention having sex, or procreating at all. Having everlasting life would indicate that a marriage would never be allowed to be broken considering you would be bound to a single person until death.

Luke 20: 34-36

And Jesus answering said unto them, The children of this world marry, and are given in marriage: But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage: Neither can they die any more: for they are equal unto the angels; and are the children of God, being the children of the resurrection.

            It seems more likely that marriage is what is being discussed here. There is nothing in these two verses that indicate that angels do not have the proper equipment to procreate. These verses also do not specify whether or not there will be sex or procreation in heaven, or whether the angels procreate themselves.

2 Peter 2: 4

For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be reserved unto judgment

            There are obviously a group of angels that God himself did not spare once they sinned. The idea that I am putting forth is the ONLY one that I see mentioned in the bible, anywhere. I do not see any evidence mentioning the Sons of God being humans, there does not seem to be any scriptural evidence to support that claim.

Jude 1: 6-7

 And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgment of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire.

            Again we see that there were a group of angels that left their own habitation. This literally means that they left their own home or place of existence in order to live somewhere else. Where else do we see any mention of angles going off to live apart from God?

            In verse 7 we see that these angels are compared to Sodom and Gamorrha, and then Jude immediately references their sexual sin. If we are to believe that the fallen angels could not exists, and even if they did, couldn’t have sex, then what is Jude talking about? Why would he mention the angels in a comparison to the sexual immoral Sodom and Gomorrha? That seems to make little sense. Contextually, there MUST be some link between the two in order to make this statement make sense.

Whether they do or do not is beside the point that I want to make. Because we know that angels CAN and DO take on the physical bodies of humans, we must also consider that in that form they are able to have sex and procreate. It is my personal belief that if angels take human form and stay in that form for an extended period of time, they may begin to be tempted by the flesh. The same temptations that all of mankind feel on a daily basis.

Galatians 5: 19-21

The acts of the flesh are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. I warn you, as I did before, that those who live like this will not inherit the kingdom of God.

            This verse seems to play directly into my theory that taking on the flesh for extended time periods caused the angels to take on the sins of the flesh as well. I also believe that being in human form also pulled the veil that covers the heavens from our site, over their eyes as well, causing a separation from God.

Romans 8: 5

Those who are in the realm of the flesh cannot please God.

            As we can read in the book of Enoch, the Watchers were no longer able to please God. He would not even allow them to stand before Him to plead their case. They chose to ask Enoch to be their “lawyer” of sorts. YHWH allowed Enoch to be the mediator for the fallen, but told Enoch to tell them they would not be forgiven for their sin.

            All in all I do not see that angels do not have the ability to procreate, and I do see evidence that shows they can at LEAST manifest into a physical body.

            Let’s take a moment to look into what angels are like according to the bible. Doing this I think we will see that not only would it be plausible for them to take wives, but even be worshiped by man.

Luke 20: 36

and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels…

            Angels are immortal. Living several generations and never changing in appearance surely would convince people that you are a god and deserve to be worshiped as such.

Luke  15: 10

In the same way, there is joy in the presence of God’s angels when even one sinner repents.”

            This verse seems to indicate that angels have emotions.

2 Samuel 14: 20

He did it to place the matter before you in a different light. But you are as wise as an angel of God, and you understand everything that happens among us!”

            It seems from this verse that angels are quite wise and have the ability to understand the things that God is doing. This too would make them appear much more intelligent than humans. Being of a higher intelligence, it would seem somewhat easy for them to convince man to worship them as gods. I believe we can see this all throughout the ancient mythologies. We continually read about how the gods came down and procreated with humans and created “Demigods”. The bible calls these things nephilim. The book of Enoch talks about how the nephilim fought against each other, we see this in Greek mythology as well.

            There are several verses in the bible that show some of the amazing abilities that angels possess. The book of John gives us a glimpse of some good an angel can do.

John 5: 4

 For an angel went down at a certain time into the pool and stirred up the water; then whoever stepped in first, after the stirring of the water, was made well of whatever disease he had.

            It is amazing that they have the ability to heal man. To put this in the context of one of them attempting to be looked upon as a god, showing this type of miracle would certainly convince people that not only were they gods, but they were good.

            Now they also had other abilities as well

Genesis 19:11

And they struck the men who were at the doorway of the house with blindness, both small and great, so that they became weary trying to find the door.

Luke 1:19-20

And the angel answered and said to him, “I am Gabriel, who stands in the presence of God, and was sent to speak to you and bring you these glad tidings. 20 But behold, you will be mute and not able to speak until the day these things take place, because you did not believe my words which will be fulfilled in their own time.”

            These two passages show that they had the ability to make men blind, and also to cause men to become mute. Both of which can be viewed as godlike abilities. Many of the ancient mythologies describe men being blinded as punishments for deeds that went against the gods or in our case the fallen angels.

            A few examples of this are Erymanthos being blinded after he saw Aphrodite bathing. Poseidon put a mist before Achilles’ eyes causing temporary blindness in order to stop him from killing Aeneas. Metope is punished by her father Echetus with blindness and must work to regain her sight. It seems that many of the same abilities that the ancient gods possessed were similar to those abilities that the bible claims angels have. I feel that this is just one more little bit of proof that there were fallen angels on earth posing as gods and having sex with humans in our ancient past.

            The origin of the Sethite view came from Augustine of Hippo during the 4th century current era. John Calvin later fed into this theory during the 17th century CE. Douglas Hamp, an author of several Christian books including “Corrupting the Image”, had this to say concerning the invention of the Sethite theory.
“Augustine says, ‘By the daughters of men the scriptures designated those who sprang from the race of Cain,’ (Augustine as quoted in Summa Theological Aquinas). We must ask the important question – where in scripture does it say such a thing? Augustine makes the claim above that scripture designates those daughters as coming from the race of Cain, but just where do we see that? The answer is that we simply do not. It was first tentatively considered by Julius Africanus and then completely invented by Augustine and then repeated by all who would follow in his footsteps ever since. If the term “sons of God” refers to the “sons of Seth” as so many suggest, then why does the text not simply state it?”

            Prior to the sons of Seth theory, the common view held was the “sons of God” were the fallen angels. There really seems to be no argument left as to why anyone would continue to suggest anything other than the term “sons of God” refers to the angels that left their first estate.

            Unless you are able to explain how the sons of Seth and the daughters of Cain can create giants, along with explaining how there were more nephilim AFTER the flood in which killed all the descendants of Cain, then you have no argument. There is no need to go any further until those two points are addressed. If, by some miracle, you are able to come up with a legitimate argument for those two things, then try to disprove everything else I have written here that surely proves that not only were fallen angel on the earth, but that they were fathering children and being worshipped as gods.


If you enjoy these blogs, join my google community here…

Also I would love to hear your opinions on things that I post on Facebook along with your original thoughts and questions. Like my page here

Thanks for taking the time to check out my blog!